Author Topic: ARCHIVE: Sam Smith's: bank forced us to cut staff  (Read 1785 times)

Offline Max

  • Administrator
  • Sr. Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 567
  • Gender: Male
    • View Profile
    • SamSmiths
Content of Morning Advertiser..


Sam Smith's: bank forced us to cut staff
05/03/2009 12:36

By Tony Halstead

Family brewer Sam Smith?s says it was forced to introduce a swingeing round of cuts to pub staff hours to reduce costs following financial pressure from its bank, an employment tribunal heard yesterday.

Brewery director Humphrey Smith said the company had been struggling to meet its bank covenants and was having difficulty renewing its overdraft when the reduction in staff hours was made last year.

The brewery, based in Tadcaster, North Yorkshire, is being sued for unfair dismissal by 18 former managers at nine different pubs who were sacked for refusing to implement the cuts.

The managers were told to reduce hours in a major cost-cutting exercise mounted by the brewery early in 2008 across its national managed pub estate.

Smith told the Sheffield tribunal: ?We were under great pressure from the bank.

?We were having great difficulty renewing our overdraft and this commercial pressure was something we could not avoid,? he said.

He told the hearing all managers had been told to cut staff hours down to 45 per week which he considered reasonable enough.

?We thought 45 hours was perfectly reasonable but they (the managers) refused to compromise,? he added.

He told the tribunal that he had studied the cost structure of other pub chains and considered his own pubs could run efficiently on the same staff working hours system.

Former managers at the company?s Holly Bush pub at Edenthorpe, Doncaster, Frank and Pam Marshall, are leading the action against the company in a test case hearing.

Smith said that at the start of 2008 profits were down 33% at the pub and staff wages accounted for 14% of the business net ?take?.

?This was unsustainable and put the future of the Holly Bush in jeapourdy,? he said.

He said the brewery had held its beer prices since 1990, mainly by increasing its productivity as the price of beer was crucial to the success of its pubs.

He considered cheap prices gave his pubs a good opportunity to maintain their trade.

?We want this business to be around in 200 years time so we want to hold up our barrelage and maintain employment within the brewery,? he explained.

Smith said he wanted his managers to increase their own productivity in difficult trading times but said many shunned new practices and adopted an ?I?m All Right Jack? attitude.

The hearing continues.

Source: Morning Advertiser
Always in support of the Samuel Smiths Brewery - although very concerned about the current company strategy towards its staff and customers, as exercised by the Directors. We believe in promoting common sense, decency, compassion, fairness and compliance with company, employment and English law.

Offline Mr Zak

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 62
    • View Profile
Give Humphrey enough rope, and he'll hang himself.

So, in the make believe land that Humphrey lives in, it's all the pub manager's fault with their "I'm alright Jack attitude".

Clearly he subscribes to the following quote from Saki (pseudonym of British author, Hector Hugh Munro 1870 - 1916): " A simple lie is better than a complicated truth."

Alternatively, he could get a job on Jackanory.

It's not over yet, until, as they say, the fat lady sings.

As long as she remembers that she's not allowed to sing in any of Humphrey's pubs!
A pint before the trouble starts.....

Offline centurion

  • Sr. Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 419
    • View Profile
?Its all about managers increasing productivity and re-inventing themselves and to some extent re-energising themselves,? Smith told the Sheffield tribunal.

I am now going to 're-invent' and re-energise' with a brew, before i go and do another 6hrs of productivity for Herr Smith and my discresionery bonus. :-*

PS Noticed that the Irish Black Stuff are making a big deal on Paddy's day for there 250th year, I must have blinked last year to miss the 250th anniversary party for the Old Brewery in Tadcaster. 8)

« Last Edit: Mar 6 - 2009 by centurion »

Offline 357maddog

  • Global Moderator
  • Sr. Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 135
  • Gender: Male
  • Mad dog hot sauce..mmm
    • View Profile
Well spotted, we too realised last year was the 250th year of brewing by the Smiths, we were working for them last year and when I enquired to FOB if there was to be any type of celebration, he just looked blankly and carried on with his cup of water.
I think he was shocked that someone had the mental capacity to work out that from 1758 to 2008 was in fact 250 years, to be honest I dont think that the thought had ever crossed his mind that the brewery might have made a celebration of it........really strange family this is to work for was my immediate reaction....lol
Most other breweries would have used that for a strong marketing campaign...Sam's....not even a mention. 
Beware the toes you tread on today are not attached to the leg that supports the arse that you are gonna have to kiss tomorrow.

Offline arwen

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 10
    • View Profile
JOKING ASIDE, I WISH ALL THE MANAGERS WELL AT TRIBUNALS, BEEN THERE AND ITS NO LAUGHING MATTER, GOOD LUCK I SAY TO YOU ALL. WATCHING WITH INTEREST TO SEE WHAT HAPPENS X

Offline ex-man

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 5
    • View Profile
i agree hope everybody gets the justice they deserve, its funny how humph never mentioned the so called bank problems when he knocked our staff hours down from 35 to 15 & he expected that over xmas & new year. funny enough i got the same response when i asked if there was going to be a celebration of 250,years suppose i should've known better